Blogs & Social Media Sites

Blogs

  • Class Counsel Blog
  • The Seventh Circuit rejects the heightened ascertainability requirement for class certification

    The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not impose a heightened ascertainablity requirement for class certification, despite precedent to the contrary elsewhere.  In Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC, No. 15-1776, 2015 WL 4546159 (7th Cir. Jul. 28, 2015), the Court of Appeals affirmed the court below, which had granted the motion to certify.  The case was a consumer fraud case, brought by a consumer who had purchased a dietary supplement for joints. The plaintiff filed a motion to certify the class of consumers who purchased the supplement for personal use during a certain time period.  After the case was certified under Rule 23(b)(3), the defendant filed an interlocutory appeal, and the Court of Appeals heard the appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f).  The Court proceeded “to address whether Rule 23(b)(3) imposes a heightened ‘ascertainability’ requirement as the Third Circuit and some district courts have held recently.”  Id., at *1. Read More ›

    Fifth Circuit Joins Split of Authority in Rejecting Rule 68 Offer of Judgment to Moot Class Action

        In Hooks v. Landmark Indus., Inc., No. 14-20496 (8/12/2015), the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit joined a minority of the federal appellate courts in holding that "an unaccepted offer of judgment cannot moot a named-plaintiff’s claim in a putative class action[.]" Slip Op., at 2. Read More ›

    Data Breach Litigation: The Sky is Falling or a Failure of Proof?

    “This is the Voice of Doom speaking! Special bulletin! Flash! The sky is falling! A piece of it just hit you on the head! Now be calm. Don't get panicky. Run for your life!” Foxy Loxy

    Much has been written recently about a decision by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Groups LLC, 2015 WL 4394814 (7th Cir. July 20, 2015) (Remijas).  In Remijas, a class of Neiman Marcus customers was found to have standing to sue under Article III of the U.S. Constitution arising from a data breach incident involving the department store chain. Standing was based not on any actual damage to the Neiman customers but upon the claimed risk of future fraudulent charges and susceptibility to theft because of the breach. This flies in the face of a number of recent decisions, which, based on Clapper v. Amnesty International, 133 S. Ct. 1138, 185 L. Ed. 2d 264, (2013), rejected standing arguments based on threatened - but not actual - harm from data breaches. Read More ›

  • Financial Services Blog

    The Financial Services Blog offers the latest information on banking development and litigation trends. Topics range from commercial and consumer lending through bankruptcy, lender liability defense, and the Dodd-Frank Act through Regulations JJ.

  • Helpful to Bankers? Changes to the TCPA of Particular Concern to Financial Institutions

    On July 10, 2015, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) came out with new rules interpreting the Telephone Consumer Protective Act (TCPA). Read More ›

    Fed’s Advice to Community Banks on Bitcoin: “Proceed … with Caution”

    Community Banks need to be aware of the risks posed by cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, because their prevalence will only increase, writes the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.  Wallace Young, the Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, in the recent article “What Community Bankers Should Know About Virtual Currencies” in Community Banking Connections, outlines four risks undertaken by community banks that interact with businesses in the virtual currency ecosystem: Compliance, Reputational, Credit, and Operational. Read More ›

    Continuity or Change? How the Supreme Court changed the law for lenders under the FHA without changing it at all.

    After leaving the public, press, regulators, and lenders lingering for six months, the Supreme Court finally produced its 5-4 opinion in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., a blockbuster case in which the Court concluded that the Fair Housing Act permits statistically-based disparate impact claims.[1]  The Supreme Court’s opinion is important for two reasons.  First, it finally puts the Supreme Court’s seal of approval on FHA disparate impact claims, a theory of liability that has been universally recognized by the federal courts of appeals.  Second, it will likely embolden plaintiffs to file more suits using a disparate impact theory, which means lenders should evaluate their current policies and practices, especially discretionary pricing policies, to avoid engaging in practices that could be interpreted as discriminatory.   Read More ›

  • International Services Group

    The International Services Group Blog is a resource for business leaders within the international commerce industry. Frost Brown Todd's international lawyers discuss the latest challenges for international trade and regulation, as well as solutions for those challenges.

  • New USCIS Policy Memorandum Clarifies Employers’ Obligations Before Relocating H-1B Employees

    Under H-1B regulations, an employer has to notify the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) of "material changes,” through the filing of an amended or new H-1B petition. However, the regulations do not explicitly explain what constitutes a material change.  Employers have generally relied on prior guidance from USCIS, which indicated that moving an H-1B employee to a new worksite did not constitute a material change if a new Labor Condition Application (LCA) was in place for the new worksite before the move.  In April 2015, the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) issued a precedent decision, Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC (Simeio),on this issue. Now, as a result of this decision, USCIS has reversed itself and has issued a new policy memorandum on the actions needed before an employee is relocated. Read More ›

    Employer Slapped With $600,000 Fine For I-9 Violations

    An administrative judge recently handed down a stunning $605,250 fine against an employer for improperly completing its I-9s. The decision, U.S. v. Hartmann Studios, Inc. (OCAHO Case No. 14A00008, July 15, 2015), serves as a reminder that employers need to be taking I-9 compliance as seriously as the government, and that preventative measures such as extensive training and self-audits can help companies avoid the government’s crosshairs. Read More ›

    China stakes its claim on regulating Internet Advertising - Draft rules issued –

    On July 1, 2015, China issued Interim Measures for Internet Advertising Supervision and Management, with a deadline of July 30 for public comment. Read More ›

    Social Media Sites


    Facebook
    Facebook is a social networking website intended to connect friends, family, and business associates. It is the largest of the networking sites.


    Twitter
    Twitter is a website, owned and operated by Twitter Inc., which offers a social networking and microblogging service, enabling its users to send and read messages called tweets.


    LinkedIn
    LinkedIn is a business-oriented social networking site. Founded in December 2002 and launched in May 2003, it is mainly used for professional networking.

    Top